RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Ceftazidime-avibactam (C/A), has shown reduction in mortality rates and risk of nephrotoxicity, compared to colistin, conventional therapy. AIM: To estimate the cost-effectiveness of C/A versus colistin + meropenem in the treatment of infections due to carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) in Chile. METHODS: An economic decision tree type model was adapted. The perspective of the public payer was used with a time horizon of 30 days and extrapolation to life expectancy. The clinical information was derived from an observational study. Medication and care costs correspond to local reports. The results are expressed as incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) per life year gained (LYG) and per quality adjusted life year (QALY) in Chilean pesos and US dollars (US$ 1.00 = $792.2218). RESULTS: 8.65 and 6.48 LYGs and 6.44 and 4.27 QALYs were obtained, for C/A and colistin + meropenem, respectively. The estimated ICER for C/A was $940,488 (US$1,187.2) per AVG and $938,715 (US$1,184.9) per QALY. DISCUSSION: Given the lack of publications or evidence, the model is based on an observational study. C/A would reduce the death rate and increase LYGs and QALYs, resulting in a cost-effective alternative vs. colistin + meropenem for CRE.
Assuntos
Ceftazidima , Colistina , Compostos Azabicíclicos , Chile , Análise Custo-Benefício , Combinação de Medicamentos , Enterobacteriaceae , MeropenémRESUMO
INTRODUCCIÓN: Ceftazidima-avibactam (C/A), ha demostrado reducir las tasas de mortalidad y el riesgo de nefrotoxicidad, comparado con colistin, la terapia convencional. OBJETIVO: Estimar la costo-efectividad de C/A versus colistin + meropenem en el tratamiento de infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae resistentes a carbapenémicos (ERC) en Chile. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Se adaptó un modelo económico tipo árbol de decisión. Se utilizó la perspectiva del pagador público, un horizonte de tiempo de 30 días con extrapolación a la expectativa de vida. La información clínica se derivó de un estudio observacional. Los costos de los medicamentos y de atención corresponden a reportes locales. Los resultados se expresan como razón de costo-efectividad incremental (RCEI) por año de vida ganado (AVG) y por año de vida ajustado por calidad (AVAC) en pesos chilenos y en dólares estadounidenses (US$ 1,00 = $792,2218). RESULTADOS: Se obtuvieron 8,65 y 6,48 AVGs y 6,44 y 4,27 AVACs, para C/A y colistin + meropenem, respectivamente. La RCEI estimada de C/A fue $940.488 (US$1.187,2) por AVG y $938.715 (US$1.184,9) por AVAC. DISCUSIÓN: Dada la falta de publicaciones o evidencia, el modelo se basa en un estudio observacional. C/A reduciría la proporción de muertes e incrementaría los AVG y los AVAC, resultando en una alternativa costo-efectiva versus colistin + meropenem para ERC.
BACKGROUND: Ceftazidime-avibactam (C/A), has shown reduction in mortality rates and risk of nephrotoxicity, compared to colistin, conventional therapy. AIM: To estimate the cost-effectiveness of C/A versus colistin + meropenem in the treatment of infections due to carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) in Chile. METHODS: An economic decision tree type model was adapted. The perspective of the public payer was used with a time horizon of 30 days and extrapolation to life expectancy. The clinical information was derived from an observational study. Medication and care costs correspond to local reports. The results are expressed as incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) per life year gained (LYG) and per quality adjusted life year (QALY) in Chilean pesos and US dollars (US$ 1.00 = $792.2218). RESULTS: 8.65 and 6.48 LYGs and 6.44 and 4.27 QALYs were obtained, for C/A and colistin + meropenem, respectively. The estimated ICER for C/A was $940,488 (US$1,187.2) per AVG and $938,715 (US$1,184.9) per QALY. DISCUSSION: Given the lack of publications or evidence, the model is based on an observational study. C/A would reduce the death rate and increase LYGs and QALYs, resulting in a cost-effective alternative vs. colistin + meropenem for CRE.
